{"created":"2023-09-29T02:38:30.527388+00:00","id":2001888,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"0adce469-e65f-44c7-8ca1-c33e85d57ebc"},"_deposit":{"created_by":5,"id":"2001888","owners":[5],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"2001888"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:ehime-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:02001888","sets":["467:494"]},"author_link":[],"item_10002_alternative_title_1":{"attribute_name":"その他（別言語等）のタイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"The case of disclosure of so-called 'typical evidence' under Article 316(15) of Criminal Procedure Act","subitem_alternative_title_language":"en"}]},"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2007-12-25","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"1/2","bibliographicPageEnd":"116","bibliographicPageStart":"97","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"34","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"愛媛法学会雑誌","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_10002_source_id_11":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN00025020","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"0389-8571","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"斎藤, 司"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_access","filename":"AN00025020_2007_34_1-97.pdf","format":"application/pdf","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"url":"https://ehime-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2001888/files/AN00025020_2007_34_1-97.pdf"},"version_id":"10788119-a4f2-46f6-9bad-de4c52ee91eb"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"刑訴法三一六条の一五にいう、いわゆる類型証拠の開示をめぐる裁定事例 : (1)大阪高裁平成一八年六月二六日決定(判時一九四〇号一六五頁)(2)最高裁平成一八年一一月一四日決定(判時一九四七号一六七頁、判夕一二二二号一〇二頁) (藤川研策教授退職記念号)","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"刑訴法三一六条の一五にいう、いわゆる類型証拠の開示をめぐる裁定事例 : (1)大阪高裁平成一八年六月二六日決定(判時一九四〇号一六五頁)(2)最高裁平成一八年一一月一四日決定(判時一九四七号一六七頁、判夕一二二二号一〇二頁) (藤川研策教授退職記念号)","subitem_title_language":"ja"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"5","path":["494"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2013-09-20"},"publish_date":"2013-09-20","publish_status":"0","recid":"2001888","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["刑訴法三一六条の一五にいう、いわゆる類型証拠の開示をめぐる裁定事例 : (1)大阪高裁平成一八年六月二六日決定(判時一九四〇号一六五頁)(2)最高裁平成一八年一一月一四日決定(判時一九四七号一六七頁、判夕一二二二号一〇二頁) (藤川研策教授退職記念号)"],"weko_creator_id":"5","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-10-13T02:45:13.625113+00:00"}